Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition, reserving liberty to challenge any adverse order passed against him in the underlying proceedings. The court held specific liberty unnecessary and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:2309
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
909 WRIT PETITION NO. 1146 OF 2024
VAIJANATH VENKATRAO JADHAV VERSUS
SUBHASH RAMRAO JADHAV AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Gapat Pramod Babanrao
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Dated : February 01, 2024
PER COURT :-
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
vj gawade/-.
Vaijanath Venkatrao Jadhav
Subhash Ramrao Jadhav
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
