Writ petition concerning declaration of the petitioner's result by the University of Mumbai. The University declared the result, the stated purpose of filing was served, and the petition was disposed of without adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903 WP-11235-24.doc
BDP-SPS-
BHARAT
DASHARATH
PANDIT
Digitally signed by BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2024.08.09 19:03:01 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11235 OF 2024
Manav Poddar
…. Petitioner.
V/s
University of Mumbai & Ors.
….. Respondents.
Mr. Rushikesh S. Kekane with Mr. Aniesh S. Jadhav, Advocates for the petitioner.
Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM: A.S. CHANDURKAR &
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE: 9th August, 2024
P.C.:-
1] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the University of Mumbai – Respondent No.1 has declared the petitioner’s result.
2] In view of aforesaid, since the purpose of filing the writ petition is served it is accordingly disposed of.
[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.]
1/1
Manav Poddar
University of Mumbai
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
