Disposed

Ashok Laxman Kamadi and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary General Administration Dept and Ors.

Bombay HC2 Feb 2024WP/11208/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the petition, granting liberty to the petitioners to apply for additional increments. The respondents were directed to decide within eight weeks, passing reasoned orders if adverse, after considering the referenced prior judgment.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to apply to Respondent-Zilla Parishad for additional increments; decision due within 8 weeks.

Ashok Laxman Kamadi and Ors. Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Husen 1 54 WP-11208-2023.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 11208 OF 2023

¶4

Ashok Laxman Kamadi And Ors. …Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents

¶7

Mr. C.K. Bhangoji a/w. E.S. Murge, for Petitioners Ms. Ashwini A. Purav, AGP for Respondent/State.

¶8

Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN RAHAMAN NADAF NADAF Date: 2024.02.09 15:33:24 +0530

¶9

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

¶10

DATE : 2 FEBRUARY 2024

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

. The Petitioners 87 in number, working with Zilla Parishad, Nashik have sough a writ of Mandamus to Respondent - Zilla Parishad to grant additional increments as per their Confidential Reports relying on Government Resolution dated 31 October 1989 There is neither an application made by the Petitioners for this relief nor any rejection by the Respondents. The Petitioners are relying on a decision of this Court in Writ Petition No. 14240 of 2019 with other connected matters dated 6 October 2022.

¶13

We dispose of this Petition granting liberty to the Petitioners to apply to the Respondent - Zilla Parishad for the reliefs as prayed in this Petition annexing copy of the judgment of this Court to their

¶14

Husen 2 54 WP-11208-2023.doc

¶15

representations. The Respondent - Zilla Parishad will take decision thereupon, and in case, the Petitioners’ case is covered by this judgment proceed, to pass necessary order. If the Respondent - Zilla Parishad is proposing to pass any adverse order then it should be reasoned one after dealing with the judgment which will be annexed by the Petitioners to their representations. If the Respondent Authority decides the applications without dealing with the order of this Court in its order, if they are placed on record, the Court would take a serious view of the matter. After the applications are so made the Respondent - Zilla Parishad will pass necessary orders as above within a period of 8 weeks thereafter subject to pressing public duties.

¶16

Writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶17

( M.M. SATHAYE, J.) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Ashok Laxman Kamadi and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary General Administration Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Laxman Kamadi and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary General Administration Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Ingale Dagadu Mahadev and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secrtary School Education Dept. and Ors.

Bachpan Bachao Andolan and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sopan Genu Gaikwad and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra Thr the Principal Secretary and Ors.

Sharad S/O Dagu Patil and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Secretary, Gen. Administration Dept. and Ors.

Shrirangdasswami Shikshan Vikas Mandal Thr. Authorized Jinedra Shriprakash Bora Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Sec. School Education and Sports Dept. and Ors.

Pramod Jagannath Kadam Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Prin. Sec. Dept. and Ors.