Petitioner’s writ petition challenging a Tahsildar’s communication directing him to file an appeal before the Deputy Director under Section 155 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for correction of land entries was disposed of, as no order passed by authorities necessitated court intervention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 14 WP.10988.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
14 WRIT PETITION NO. 10988 OF 2024
BABURAO VISHWANATH DABHADE VERSUS THE GOVERNMENT MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam J. Pahilwan. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S. B. Jadhav.
P.C.:
2 The petitioner is aggrieved by the communication dated 10th October, 2022 issued by the Tahsildar, Phulambri to the petitioner informing him to approach the proper authority i.e. the Deputy Director, Land Records, Aurangabad, by way of filing an appeal. The petitioner had approached the Tahsildar by filing an application purportedly under Section 155 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for correction of entries in revenue record. He wants, by way of corrections, to show his name in land Gat No.48 instead of land Gat No.44.
2
14 WP.10988.2024.odt
The writ petition, therefore, stands disposed of.
[ KISHORE C. SANT, J. ]
nga
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Tahsildar’s communication directing the petitioner to approach the Deputy Director for correction of land revenue entries.
Whether there is any record of necessity for the exercise of jurisdiction of this Court.
BABURAO VISHWANATH DABHADE
THE GOVERNMENT MAHARASHTRA
KISHORE C. SANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
