Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition on the ground that the impugned order had lived its life. The court granted leave to withdraw with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:6039
1 9-Cri.WP No.107.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 107 OF 2024
Suraj Babarao Nagmote
..VS..
Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. P.V. Navlani, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Hulke, APP for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : G.A. SANAP, J. DATED : 12th JUNE, 2024
Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the impugned order has lived its life. In view of this, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to adopt appropriate proceeding as and when occasion arise.
(G.A. SANAP, J.)
Kirtak
Suraj Babarao Nagmote
Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division
G.A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
