The petitioner's application for leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to resort to appropriate remedies.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
913.WP.10575.24.odt
2024:BHC-AUG:25280-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10575 OF 2024
RAJKUMAR KAKASAHEB PANDORE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
... Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Pooja V. Langhe AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.P. Joshi
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATE : 15.10.2024
PER COURT:
Learned advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to resort to the
appropriate remedy as is available to him in law.
prayed for.
(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
habeeb
1/1
RAJKUMAR KAKASAHEB PANDORE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
MANGESH S. PATIL
SHAILESH P. BRAHME
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
