This court discharged costs pending delay in deposit, accepted subsequent payment, and directed the office to accredit the receipt.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10472 OF 2024
Purushottam Laxman Pawar VERSUS
Vinitkumar Nandkishor Sahani & others
Mrs. Rashmi Kulkarni h/f Mr. S. D. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 12th FEBRUARY, 2025
PER COURT :-
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
ssp
1 of 1
wp10472.24.odt
Purushottam Laxman Pawar
Vinitkumar Nandkishor Sahani
R. M. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
