Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after the petitioner settled the matter with respondents in the trial court and received possession of the suit premises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:20686
Diksha Rane 19. WP 10441-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.10441/2019
JARAL DAVID FERNANDES VS.
..PETITIONER
MOHAMMED WAJID MOHAMMED WAHID ANSARI & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS
Adv. Brijesh Shukla for the petitioner. None for the respondents.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : MAY 6, 2024.
P.C. :
1. Mr. Shukla appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settled between the parties before the trial Court, and the petitioner has received the possession of the suit premises.
2. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1/1
Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 06/05/2024 15:12:00
JARAL DAVID FERNANDES
MOHAMMED WAJID MOHAMMED WAHID ANSARI
ANR
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
