Writ petitions were heard for some time; petitioners' counsel sought liberty to file proper petitions. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty and kept all parties' contentions open.
Withdrawal permitted with liberty to file fresh petitions; all contentions kept open; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
909-910-911 WP1032-24GR.DOC
Mohite
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by TRUSHA TRUSHA TUSHAR TUSHAR MOHITE MOHITE Date: 2024.01.23 17:35:26 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 1032 OF 2024
Indira Tolaram Gemnani … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. …Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1033 OF 2024
Heramani Ochani … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. …Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1034 OF 2024
Indira Tolaram Gemnani … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. …Respondents
Ms.Minal Chandnani i/b Mr.Jaiwant S. Chandnani Associates for the Petitioners
Ms.Shruti D. Vyas, Addl.G.P. a/w Mr.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for the State
_______________________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATED: 23 January, 2024
P.C.
Page 1 of 2 23 January, 2024
909-910-911 WP1032-24GR.DOC
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.)
(G. S. KULKARNI , J.)
Page 2 of 2 23 January, 2024
Indira Tolaram Gemnani
The State of Maharashtra
Heramani Ochani
G. S. Kulkarni
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
