The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the original proceedings were disposed of. No substantive law was applied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:22280
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
919 WRIT PETITION NO. 10258 OF 2024
MOHAMMAD AZIM SHAIKH AKBAR THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY SHAIKH AAMIR AZIM
VERSUS
RAJMUDRA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD., THR ITS DIRECTOR AND ANR
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. B.S. Deshmukh h/f. Mr. A.M. Pawar Advocate for Respondent 1 : Mr. Bora Satyajit S.
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : September 20, 2024
PER COURT :-
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
ssc/
MOHAMMAD AZIM SHAIKH AKBAR THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY SHAIKH AAMIR AZIM
RAJMUDRA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD.
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
