7. On the other hand, Mr. Mishra, learned counsel representing respondent no. 2-Maharashtra Airport Development Company Limited has argued that the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, by passing the order dated 29th November 2023 had declined to entertain the writ petition on the ground that the Arbitration proceedings had already been resorted to and in view of the final disposal of the writ petition by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, the interim order dated 17th August 2023, as corrected by means of order dated 13th September 2023, is not operative as on today and hence, there is no illegality in rejecting the technical bid of the petitioner-company. 8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we find force in the submission made by learned counsel representing respondent no. 2. Having perused the order dated 29th November 2023 whereby the petition filed by the petitioner challenging the order of debarment passed by the AAI was finally disposed of, it is abundantly clear that the Hon’ble Delhi High Court refused to entertain the writ petition on the ground that the Arbitration proceedings had already been taken recourse to. Thus, the interim order passed earlier on 17th August 2023, as corrected by means of the order dated 13th
