Challenge to an appellate court order permitting demarcation of suit property per a partition decree, with no possession handover during the pendency of appeal. The High Court found no error and directed expeditious disposal of the long-pending Exhibit 5 application within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 11
2024:BHC-AUG:21872
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
11 WRIT PETITION NO. 10086 OF 2024
SHRIMANT ASARAM FALKE
VERSUS
MANDABAI BHIMRAO MHASKE DIED THROUGH LRS NIRMALA BHIMRAO BHISE AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Mahajan Sandeep Y.
WRIT PETITION NO. 10092 OF 2024
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 18th SEPTEMBER, 2024
PER COURT:
2 11
maintained in all it’s entirety.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]
marathe
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellate court's interim order permitting demarcation of the suit property without handing over possession pending appeal was sustainable.
Shrimant Asaram Falke
Mandabai Bhimrao Mhaske (died) through LRs Nirmala Bhimrao Bhise and Others
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
