Caveator sought permission to withdraw the caveat. The court permitted the withdrawal and reconvened the matter back to the Testamentary Petition.
Caveat withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
912_TS_203_16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 203 OF 2016 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1418 OF 2015
Jyoti Vinod Shirke … Petitioner/Plaintiff vs. Fali Burjorji Mehta … Defendant/Caveator
Mr. Suyash Kalbhor, i/b. B. G. Saraf for petitioner/plaintiff.
Mr. Abrar A. N. R. Chaudhary for defendant/caveator.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 10th MAY, 2024
P.C. :
. The learned counsel appearing for the caveator/defendant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the caveat.
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
Priya Kambli
PRIYAKAMBLI Digitallysigned byPRIYAKAMBLIDate:2024.05.1014:32:18+0530
1/1
Jyoti Vinod Shirke
Fali Burjorji Mehta
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
