This Testamentary Suit was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the consistent non-appearance of the plaintiff's representative despite adjournments and a final chance given.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
11-ts-12.22.doc
BIPIN DHARMENDERPRITHIANI Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANIDate: 2024.04.10 10:42:12 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 12 OF 2022 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 2157 OF 2019
Sheetal Ramgen Dubey … Plaintiff/ Petitioner Versus Shravan Ramgen Dubey … Defendant/ Caveator Ramgen RamdularDubey … Deceased ****** None for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 8th APRIL 2024
P.C. :
“. On 17th January 2024, this Court found that while the learned counsel for the caveator/defendant was present in Court and ready for arguments, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner/plaintiff. These proceedings were adjourned to 7th February 2024.
bipin prithiani
2
11-ts-12.22.doc
MANISH PITALE, J.
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
