The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of Second Appeal No. 87 of 2014 based on consent terms signed by Respondent No. 2, with the parties instructed to abide by said terms.
Appeal disposed of in terms of consent signed by Respondent No. 2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-GOA:1146
SA 87 of 2014
Amrut
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
SECOND APPEAL NO.87 OF 2014
COMMUNIDADE OF CORTALIM THR. ITS ATTORNEY JOHN PHILIP PEREIRA ... APPELLANT Versus
ANICETO LUIS DE SA AND ANR.,
... RESPONDENTS
Mr Vithal Naik, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr T. Rane, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr A. Arlekar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Respondent No.2 present in person.
CORAM:- M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATED :- 19th July, 2024
P.C.:
Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 identifies Respondent No.2 who is personally present in the Court and says that the consent terms have been duly signed by him. The consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The parties to abide by the consent terms. The appeal is disposed of in accordance with the terms mentioned in the consent terms. No costs.
M. S. KARNIK, J.
Signed by: AMRUT NAGESH TARI Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 20/07/2024 15:34:12
Page 1 of 1
19th July, 2024
COMMUNIDADE OF CORTALIM THR. ITS ATTORNEY JOHN PHILIP PEREIRA
ANICETO LUIS DE SA
ANR.
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
