The High Court dismissed a Second Appeal and a pending application for want of prosecution as the appellant did not appear on the day of hearing despite a previous notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chitra Sonawane 1 8-SA-587-2000.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Second Appeal No.587 of 2000
a/w
Civil Application (St) No.21925 of 2002
Sadanand Laxman Jadhav…Appellant.
Vs.
…
Laxman Nago JadhavRespondent.
None for appellant.
for respondent.
Coram: R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 5 February 2024.
P.C. :-
Earlier also none appeared for the appellant and therefore,
the matter was placed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today
also none present for the appellant. This appeal is pending since
the year 2000. In view of this, the appeal stands dismissed for
want of prosecution. Pending application is also disposed of.
Sadanand Laxman Jadhav
Laxman Nago Jadhav
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court