The second appeal was disposed of as infructuous upon the appellant's counsel submitting that the appeal had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
212 Sa-494-2011.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 494 OF 2011
Smt. Parvatibai Kashinath Supekar and Others.
...Appellants.
Versus
Vinayak Bapu Supekar and Others.
...Respondents.
Mr. Graham Francis i/b Mr. V. S. Talkute for the appellant.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : January 25, 2024.
P. C. :
1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that appeal has been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement, appeal stands disposed of as infructuous.
2. In view of the disposal of second appeal, civil/interim application(s) taken out in this appeal, if any, does not survive and the same is disposed of.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Patil-SR
Smt. Parvatibai Kashinath Supekar and Others
Vinayak Bapu Supekar and Others
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court