Civil Appellate jurisdiction. The present second appeal, pending since 1998, was dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared for the appellants on the listing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SMITA SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVES GONSALVES Date: 2024.02.13 15:49:41+0530
8.sa369-98.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.369 OF 1998
Shri Shankar Dadu Mote, since deceased through his heir & legal representative ...Appellant vs. Shri Sahebu Bapu Dhayagude ...Respondent
None for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 13 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C. :
. On the earlier occasion, since none appeared for the appellants, the matter was posted for today under the caption 'for dismissal'.
(R.N. LADDHA, J.)
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution given the pendency since 1998.
Shri Shankar Dadu Mote
Shri Sahebu Bapu Dhayagude
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court