Disposed

Shri. Sanjay Gangadahar Bhamre v. Shri. Tushar Dadaji Ahire (through Natural Guardian, Kalpana Dadaji Ahire)

Bombay HC9 Jan 2024SA/338/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this second appeal, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of the matter by taking on record consent terms executed between the parties, which amicably settled all disputes. The court held that nothing survives for consideration as the settlement bars further litigation on the decree.

What did the court decide?

Second Appeal disposed of without prejudice. Directing Executing Court to record consent terms and declare decree satisfied.

Shri. Sanjay Gangadahar Bhamre Vs Shri… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Bombay HC (2024)

2024:BHC-AS:949

906sa338-12

sa_mandawgad

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

SECOND APPEAL NO.338 OF 2012

¶6

Shri. Sanjay Gangadahar Bhamre … Appellant. Versus Shri. Tushar Dadaji Ahire (through Natural Guardian, Kalpana Dadaji Ahire) and Ors. … Respondents.

¶7

Mr. Sanjay Prabhakar Shinde, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Swapnil V. Walve i/by Mr.Suresh M. Kamble, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

¶8

Ms. Yogita M. Deshmukh, for Respondent Nos.3 to 5.

¶9

CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : JANUARY 09, 2024

¶10

P. C.:

¶11

Learned counsel appearing for the Appellant has tendered

¶12

the copy of the consent terms executed between the Respondent No.1, Respondent No.2 and Respondent No.5, wherein they have amicably settled all their disputes. The same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.

¶13

The Respondent No.1 is the son of Respondent No.5 and Respondent No.2 is the wife of Respondent No.5. The Respondent No.2 and Respondent No.5 have obtained divorce by mutual

¶14

1/2

¶15

906sa338-12

¶16

consent and have settled all their disputes. Clause 5 of the consent terms would indicate that in respect of Regular Civil Suit No.91 of 2003, the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have received certain amounts and as such, there is no dispute pending between the parties. The consent terms have been signed by the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and Respondent No.5.

¶17

The present Second Appeal has been filed by the original defendant no.6, who was the subsequent purchaser of the property. In view of the fact that the disputes has now been settled between the parties, nothing survives further for consideration in the Second Appeal. The Second Appeal is disposed of in view of the consent terms.

¶18

The Executing Court is directed to take the consent terms on record and passed appropriate order. It is clarified that in view of the consent terms executed between the parties, the decree as passed between the parties stands satisfied.

¶19

( Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.)

¶20

2/2

Shri. Sanjay Gangadahar Bhamre v. Shri. Tushar Dadaji Ahire (through Natural Guardian, Kalpana Dadaji Ahire)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Sanjay Gangadahar Bhamre v. Shri. Tushar Dadaji Ahire (through Natural Guardian, Kalpana Dadaji Ahire)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash S/O Mahesh Sharma Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shri.Damodar Narayan Kshirsagar Vs Gopinath Kathod Patil (Deceased) Thru Lrs.

1. Kunal Vilas Kabadi and Ors. Vs 1. Pashmin Kunal Kabadi Nee Pashmin Sukhadav Kinalekar and Anr.

Shri. Shivaji Nagu Gurav and Ors. Vs Shri. Anant Ramchandra Gurav and Ors.

Mrs. Maria Fernandes Vs Shri. Ismail Masjid Kumte

Mrs. Maria Fernandes Vs Shri. Ismail Masjid Kumte