Second appeal filed inadvertently; counsel sought leave to withdraw with apology. The High Court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SA 14 of 2024
Andreza
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
SECOND APPEAL NO.14 OF 2024
... APPELLANTS
UDAY ISHWAR RANE AND ANR ... APPELLANTS Versus ALANKAR CHANDRAKANT PARKAR AND 3 ORS ... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Parag Gajanan Waghle , Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. P. Dangui, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate with Ms. Annelise Fernandes, Advocate for Respondent nos. 3 and 4.
CORAM:- M. S. KARNIK, J. DATED :- 9th August, 2024
P.C.
The appeal was filed inadvertently. Learned Counsel for the appellants tendered an apology and seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.
M. S. KARNIK, J.
Signed by: ANDREZA RODRIGUES EPEREIRA Designation: Private Secretary Date: 12/08/2024 14:30:20
Page 1 of 1
9th August, 2024
Uday Ishwar Rane and Anr
Alankar Chandrakant Parkar
Respondent Nos. 2
Respondent No. 3
Respondent No. 4
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
