Single-line order extending time by six months under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, despite being titled Second Appeal No. 104 of 2019.
Time is extended by six months as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26-SA.104.2019.odt
Tauseef
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO.104 OF 2019
Maroti Sakharam Korde & Ors. ...Appellants Versus Dattatraya Ramngeer Giri …Respondent
Adv. Arvind S. Deshmukh for Appellants.
Adv. Indrale Anand Patil and Vinayakrao for Respondent.
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : 16th DECEMBER 2024.
P.C.:-
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)
1 of 1
Maroti Sakharam Korde & Ors.
Dattatraya Ramngeer Giri
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
