Review petition dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel showed inability to argue for want of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SMITA SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVES GONSALVES Date: 2024.02.28 18:05:57+0530
201.rps16-17.doc
sg
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO.16 OF 2007
Sumati Yashwant Mathure (Since Deceased) through LR. Prakash Yashwant Mathure (Since Deceased) through LR. Prachi Prakash Mathure
... Petitioner
v/s.
Vasant Narayan Karkhanis (Since Deceased) through LRs. 1A. Pushpa Vasant Karkhanis (Since Deceased) through LRs.& Ors.
... Respondents
Mr. Sachin Chavan, for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : R.N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 27 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C. :
. When this review petition was called out, the learned Counsel for the review petitioner showed his inability to argue the matter for want of instructions.
(R.N. LADDHA, J.)
1 of 1
Sumati Yashwant Mathure (Since Deceased) through LRs. Prakash Yashwant Mathure (Since Deceased) through LR. Prachi Prakash Mathure
Vasant Narayan Karkhanis (Since Deceased) through LRs. 1A. Pushpa Vasant Karkhanis (Since Deceased) through LRs. & Ors.
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
