In this criminal revision application, the High Court of Bombay held that the Family Court's order granting interim maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month was not exorbitant. The revision stood rejected for lack of reasons to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:1253
Urmila Ingale 11-revn-607-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 607 OF 2017
SANTOSH MARUTI LADE ..APPLICANT VS. POONAM SANTOSH LADE AND ORS. ..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Sachin S. Punde, for Applicant.
Mr. Yuvraj A. Tajane a/w Mr. Ashok B. Tajane, for the Respondents No. 1 and 2. Ms. S. D.Shinde, APP for the State-Respondent No.3.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JANUARY 11, 2024
P.C. :
1/2
Urmila Ingale 11-revn-607-17.doc
labourer in Karad and has no sufÏcient means to pay the maintenance which is an exorbitant amount.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
2/2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court erred in appreciating evidence and granting interim maintenance of Rs. 2,500 per month to the wife and minor daughter.
Whether the claimed maintenance amount of Rs. 5,000 per month can be described as exorbitant or unjust.
Whether the applicant's employment status and income were sufficiently brought on record to justify interference.
SANTOSH MARUTI LADE
POONAM SANTOSH LADE
ANOTHER RESPONDENT
THE STATE
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
