In this criminal revision application, the bench held that since the underlying FIR was already quashed, nothing survived for consideration. The application was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly without detailed argument.
The revision application was allowed to be withdrawn and the matter was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:12143
Urmila Ingale p-1revn-465-22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 465 OF 2022
Jaydeep Jitendra Nagrecha and ors. .. Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra and anr. ..Respondents
Mr.Venkatesh Shinde h/f Mr.Shekhar Jagtap i/b J.Shekhar Associates, for the applicant. Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : MARCH 13, 2024
P.C. :
1. Not on board; taken on board.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant states that as the
FIR itself is quashed, nothing survives for consideration in this revision application. The revision application is allowed
to be withdrawn and the same is disposed of accordingly.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Signed by: Urmila P. Ingale Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 13/03/2024 17:48:37
Jaydeep Jitendra Nagrecha and ors.
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
