In appeals filed for maintenance orders, the court disposed of the matter based on an out-of-court settlement and mutual consent to file a divorce petition before the Trial Court.
The criminal revision applications were disposed of based on the settlement terms; matters remitted to the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:16628
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
963 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 30 OF 2023 JEKAB JOSEPH YADAV VERSUS
MANJU W/O JEKAB YADAV
Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Kale Pratiksha Chhaburao. Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Deshmukh Manisha Digambar.
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J. DATE : 02.08.2024
PER COURT :-
vmk/-
JEKAB JOSEPH YADAV
MANJU W/O JEKAB YADAV
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
