Sudip Narayan Tamhankar v. State of Goa Thr the Chief Secretary and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Bombay at Goa, PIL Writ Petition No. 8/2024. Petitioner sought removal of a temporary jetty. Learned AG stated jetty would be removed in two months; court accepted and directed respondents to comply.
What did the court decide?
Respondents directed to remove the temporary jetty within two months.
What the court decided
9-PILWP-8-2024.DOC
Suchitra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
PIL WRIT PETITION NO.8/2024
SUDIP NARAYAN TAMHANKAR
… PETITIONER
Versus
STATE OF GOA THR THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 5 ORS. … RESPONDENTS
Mr Shrikrishna alias Amogh Sawaikar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr D. Pangam, AG with Mr M. Salkar, GA for the State. Mr Shivan Desai with Mr A. Sardessai, Advocates for Resp. No.2. Mr Nikhil Pai, Advocate for Respondent No.5.
CORAM: M. S. SONAK & VALMIKI MENEZES, JJ.
DATE: 8th MAY 2024
P.C.:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUDIP NARAYAN TAMHANKAR
- respondent
STATE OF GOA
Coram
M. S. SONAK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Antonio Salvador Custodio De Britto Vs High Court on Its Own Motion (in the Matter of Illegal Construction)
Rithika Gadekar Vs High Court on Its Own Motion (in the Matter of Illegal Construction)
Janardhan Shirodkar Vs High Court on Its Own Motion (in the Matter of Illegal Construction)
M/S. Dcs Solar Energy Limited Rep. Thr. Its Auth. Representative Aarti Jagdish Shah Vs State of Goa Thr. the Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.