Writ petition concerning SEBI and others; the Bench observed that considering the prayers and averments it appears to be a Public Interest Litigation and directed the Registry to place the matter before the appropriate Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI
Digitally signed by TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Date: 2024.06.13 18:34:10 +0530
Tauseef 03-WP.3610.2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3610 OF 2021
Varun Dev Jha & Ors ...Petitioners Versus
Securities & Exchange Board of India & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Shreyas Shrivastava a/w. Mr. Saurabh Shrivastava and Ms. Sonali Naik for the Petitioners.
Mr. Omprakash Jha a/w. Mr. Kalyan Reddy i/b. M/s. The Law Point for Respondent No.1.
Ms. Suchitra Valjee a/w. Adv. Riya Kamdar i/b. M/s. Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for Respondent No.4.
Ms. Chitra Rentalal a/w. Ms. Kriti Srivastava i/b. M/s. Trilegal for Respondent Nos.5 and 6.
Ms. Zarnaab Aswad i/b. M/s. Khaitan & Co. for Respondent No.3.
Mr. Vinit Jain for Respondent No.7 (UOI).
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM, JITENDRA JAIN, J.J. DATED : 12th JUNE 2024
P.C.
petition, it appears more to be a Public Interest Litigation. Registry to
place the same before the appropriate Court.
[JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [K. R. SHRIRAM, J.]
1 of 1
Varun Dev Jha & Ors
Securities & Exchange Board of India
Respondent No.7 (Union of India)
K.R. Shriram
Jitendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
