In a PIL concerning public interest, the petitioner sought and was granted liberty to withdraw the petition, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed LAXMIKANT by LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2024.01.16 15:47:34 +0530
1 (401) PIL-2.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 2 OF 2024
Prakash Narayan Sadamast : Petitioner. Vs. Mukesh Kantilal Sarda & ors. : Respondents.
Ms. Jyoti Sada for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Mr. O A Chandurkar, Addl.GP and Mrs. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondents-State.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 15th JANUARY, 2024
P.C. :
1 After arguing at some length, learned counsel
representing the Petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the present
Public Interest Litigation Petition.
2 Accordingly the present Public Interest Litigation
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1 of 1
LGC
Prakash Narayan Sadamast
Mukesh Kantilal Sarda
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
