Old writ petitions and a PIL, listed as infructuous after notice, were called out with no appearance or praecipe from the petitioners; the court disposed of them with liberty to revive if cause of action survives.
Petitions disposed of with liberty to revive if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
306-WP-5455-2000.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5455 OF 2000
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9218 OF 2000 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5455 OF 2000
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9219 OF 2000 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5455 OF 2000
Ms. Heta Pandit V/s.
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Petitioner
Respondents
WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 8 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 788 OF 2002 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 8 OF 2002
Shri. Anil Gajanan Bodhe
Petitioner
V/s.
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakde, G. P. a/w Smt. A. A. Purav, AGP for the Respondent/State.
C0RAM : G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2024
PC :
Kiran Kawre 1/2
306-WP-5455-2000.doc
Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed and disposed of as infructuous. These petitions are also in the list. This list of infructuous matters was notified by the office by its notice dated 25 January 2024, by which the parties/advocates were intimated that if the proceedings have not become infructuous, then a praecipe be submitted in the office before its listing stating that the matter needs to be adjudicated. Accordingly, after such prior notice, these matters are listed today before this Court.
2 No praecipe has been received on behalf of the petitioners or the advocate for the petitioners stating that something would survive for adjudication in these petitions.
3 Even when these petitions were called out, none appears for the petitioners. It, therefore, appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute these petitions and/or they have become infructuous. These petitions are, accordingly, disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive these petitions, in the event, the petitioners feels that the cause of action still survive.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Kiran Kawre 2/2
Ms. Heta Pandit
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Shri. Anil Gajanan Bodhe
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
G. S. Kulkarni
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
