Disposed

Milind Kashinathrao Dongre v. the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC18 Apr 2024NMW/127/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought restoration of a 2015 writ petition for benefits under a Government Resolution dated 30 March 2012, which had been rejected under Rule 986 of the Original Side Rules. The court restored the petition subject to removal of office objections within four weeks and disposed of a subsequent identical 2021 writ petition as unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

Notice of Motion No.127 of 2016 allowed; WP(L) 2849/2015 restored subject to office objections removed in four weeks; WP(L) 28872/2021 disposed.

Milind Kashinathrao Dongre Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶2

WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.28872 OF 2021

¶3

Milind Kashinathrao Dongre Vs.

¶4

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

¶5

.. Petitioner-Applicant

¶6

.. Respondents

¶7

ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.127 OF 2016 IN

¶8

WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.2849 OF 2015

¶9

Milind Kashinathrao Dongre .. Petitioner-Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents

¶10

Mr. Rajendra V. Kamble, Advocate for the Petitioner-Applicant. Mr. Mohit Jadhav, Addl. G.P. for the Respondent-State of Maharashtra. Mr. Aumkar Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

¶11

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ DATE : 18^TH APRIL, 2024.

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

The petitioner had filed Writ Petition (Lodging) No.2849 of 2015 seeking a direction to receive benefits in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 30^th March 2012. This writ petition came to be rejected under Rule 986 of the Original Side Rules as the office objections were not removed.

¶14

To seek restoration of Writ Petition (Lodging) No.2849 of 2015, the petitioner has filed Notice of Motion No.127 of 2016. When this Notice of Motion was pending, the petitioner has filed another Writ Petition with Lodging No.22872 of 2021 making identical prayers as made in the earlier writ petition.

¶15

SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT

¶16

Digitally signed by SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT Date: 2024.04.18 16:22:23 +0530

¶17

1/2

¶18

19-WP(L)-28872-2021 & NMW-127-2016.doc Dixit

¶19

Considering the reasons assigned by the petitioner in Notice of Motion No.127 of 2016, the same is allowed. Writ Petition (Lodging) No.2849 of 2015 is restored subject to the office objections being removed within a period of four weeks from today. Notice of Motion is disposed of.

¶20

After the office objections are removed within a period of four weeks, the learned counsel for the petitioner to serve a copy of Writ Petition (Lodging) No.2849 of 2015 on the learned AGP appearing for respondent nos.1 and 2 as well as the learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3.

¶21

In view of restoration of the earlier proceedings, the writ petition filed subsequently being Writ Petition (Lodging) No.28872 of 2021 is not required to be entertained in view of similarity of reliefs sought in the proceedings. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶22

[ JITENDRA JAIN, J. ]

¶23

[ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]

¶24

2/2

¶25

19-WP(L)-28872-2021 & NMW-127-2016.doc Dixit

Milind Kashinathrao Dongre v. the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Milind Kashinathrao Dongre v. the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maheshkumar G Garodia Vs the Union Ofindia through the Office of Deputy Salt Commissioner

Shri. Dilip Mansukhlals Shah and Ors. Vs Shri. Chandrakant Kantilal Shah and Ors.

Dnyandeep Vikas Pratisthan, Vs National Council for Teacher Educaytion and Anr.

Maharashtra Wholesale Wine Merchants Assocation and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Naigaon Education Soc Thr Its Secretary and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.

National Fishworkers Forum Thr. Its Auth. Representative Smt. Jyoti Rajesh Meher and Ors. Vs Dahanu Taluka Environment Protection Authority and Ors.