Allowed

Lekha Nitin Motani v. Suryakant Hargovindas Shah (Deceased)

Bombay HC23 Aug 2024MPT/207/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court (Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction) allowed a miscellaneous petition filed by the children of a deceased individual, allowing the issuance of an heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 to recognize them as the sole legal heirs, dispensing with the issuance of a proclamation.

What did the court decide?

Issuance of a Certificate of Heirship to the Petitioners under Section 2 of Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, recognising them as the only legal heirs, with the issue of proclamation dispensed with.

Lekha Nitin Motani vs Suryakant Hargovindas Shah… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-OS:12996

¶2

17 mpt 207 of 2024.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISC. PETITION NO.207 OF 2024

¶4

Lekha Nitin Motani and Ors.

¶5

… Petitioners

¶6

Suryakant Hargovindas Shah … Deceased

¶7

Ms. Rachana Kapasi, for Petitioners.

¶8

CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J.

¶9

DATE : 23 AUGUST 2024

¶10

P.C.

¶11

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners.

¶12

This petition is filed for grant of heirship certificate under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827.

¶13

Suryakant Hargovindas Shah (deceased) was the father of the Petitioners. The deceased passed away on 11 July 2009 at Mumbai. AT the time of his death, he had a fixed place of abode at 32, Amoolya, 195, Walkeshwar Road, Teen Batti, Mumbai — 400 006.

¶14

The Petitioners aver that the deceased died intestate and despite diligent search, no testamentary writing or Will has been found. Kailashmati Shah, wife of the deceased, passed away on 23 June 2016. A copy of the death certificate of Kailashmati Shah is at Exhibit C to the Petition. Apart from the Petitioners, there is no other legal heir. Heirship certificate is required for formal recognition as the legal heirs

¶15

SSP 1/2

¶16

17 mpt 207 of 2024.doc

¶17

of the deceased.

¶18

I have perused the averments in the Petition. The documents annexed to the Petition lend support to the claim of the Petitioners. It appears that the deceased left behind Kailashmati Shah and the Petitioners. Kailashmati Shah passed away on 23 June 2016. The Petitioners appear to be the only surviving Class I heirs of the deceased. Heirship certificate is required for formal recognition as the legal heirs of the deceased. I, therefore, do not find any impediment in granting heirship certificate.

¶19

Hence, the following order :

¶20

ORDER

¶21

(i) The Petition stands allowed in terms of prayer

¶22

clause (b), which reads as under :

¶23

“(b) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Certificate of Heirship to the Petitioners under the provisions of Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 recognising, declaring and certifying that the Petitioners are the only legal heirs and representatives of the said Deceased; (ii) Issue of proclamation is dispensed with. (iii) Grant be expedited.

¶24

( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )

¶25

SSP 2/2

¶26

Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 26/08/2024 18:59:35

Lekha Nitin Motani v. Suryakant Hargovindas Shah (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lekha Nitin Motani v. Suryakant Hargovindas Shah (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyamsundar Baburao Madhav vs Parvatibai Baburao Madhav Alias Parvatibai B Madhav Alias P B Madhav

Mohammed Hamid Atik Kureshi vs Shahida Kbatoon Atik Kureshi (Deceased)

Vaishali Atul Ranpise vs Atul Narayan Ranpise (Deceased)

Ramesh Chandra Mishra and Another vs the Custodian and Others

Rajkumar Ramsamuj Mishra vs Ramsamuz Shribhagwat Mishra Alias Ramsamuj Mishra (Deceased)

Vijay Jayarama Shetty vs Vinoda Jayarama Shetty Alias Vinodi Jayram Shetty