Allowed

The Administrator General v. Jai Shree Krishna Co-Opeative Housing Society Ltd.

Bombay HC6 Feb 2024MPT/112/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Maharashtra High Court allowed a miscellaneous petition filed by the Administrator General under Section 10 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963, to administer a subject flat belonging to a deceased individual.

What did the court decide?

The petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) granting the petitioner powers to administer and repair the subject flat.

The Administrator General Vs Jai Shree Krishna Co-Opeative… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

bipin prithiani

11-mpt-112.19.doc

BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI

¶5

Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANI Date: 2024.02.08 10:22:41 +0530

¶6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

¶7

MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 112 OF 2019

¶8

The Administrator General

¶9

… Petitioner

¶10

Versus

¶11

Jai Shree Krishna Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.

¶12

… Deceased

¶13

¶14

Mr. Sukanta Karmakar, AGP for the Petitioner. Mr. Jash B. Vyas for Respondent.

¶15

¶16

CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J.

¶17

DATE : 6 FEBRUARY 2024

¶18

P.C. :

¶19

. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

By this petition, the petitioner i.e. the Administrator General of the Maharashtra State has invoked Section 10 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), to administer the subject property by exercising powers under Section 10 of the said Act.

¶21

Mr Karmakar, learned AGP appearing for the petitioner invited attention of this Court to the order dated 17^th July 2008 passed by this Court in Notice of Motion No. 2375 of 2008 in Suit No. 1840 of 2008, whereby this Court appointed the

11-mpt-112.19.doc

bipin prithiani

petitioner to take possession of the subject property i.e. a flat located in the respondent - Co-operative Housing Society. The petitioner was also permitted to carry out repairs in the said flat and to submit a report to this Court. The aforesaid suit has been filed by the respondent-Society in respect of the subject flat. It is informed that the aforesaid suit was transferred to the City Civil Court and that it is pending as on today.

¶26

The respondent-Society has filed reply affidavit in the present petition indicating that it has no objection to the prayers being granted. But, a concern is raised about the amount due in respect of the said flat.

¶27

This Court has perused Section 10 of the said Act. It empowers the petitioner i.e. the Administrator General, Maharashtra State to exercise appropriate powers to maintain properties, which is in this case is the subject flat.

¶28

Considering the contents of the petition and the purpose for which the petitioner has approached this Court, the petition deserves to be allowed.

¶29

In view of the above, the petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

¶30

The respondent-Society would be at liberty to take such

bipin prithiani

11-mpt-112.19.doc

steps as available in law for recovery of the amounts due in respect of the said flat.

¶35

MANISH PITALE, J.

The Administrator General v. Jai Shree Krishna Co-Opeative Housing Society Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Administrator General v. Jai Shree Krishna Co-Opeative Housing Society Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeeva Sundaram Kounder Vs Sundaram Kounder S/O Madavan Alias Madhavan Kannammal (Deceased)

Nainesh Moreshwar Mokal Vs Neelima Rushi Mali

Padma Raghava Shetty Vs 1A. Mrs. Yashodha Krishna Shetty and Other

V Sai Subramanian vs Venkatraman Kandaswamy Iyer

Hootoxi Ghosal Vs Subroto Ghosal Alias Subroto Surendranath Ghosal(Deceased)

Sangita Ramesh Tambdkar Alias Sangeeta Ramesh Tambadkar Vs Krishnabai Shankar Bhanarkar (Deceased)