Applicants sought that a pending domestic violence proceeding be factored into a custody case before the Family Court at Bandra. The respondent-wife undertook not to raise the pendency of the domestic violence proceeding as a defense. The court heard both sides and rejected the miscellaneous civil application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39-MCA-65-2023.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.65 OF 2023
Varun Narendra Agarwal and ors. … Applicants versus Priyanka Varun Agarwal …. Respondent
Ms. Sushmita Sherigar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Asif Naqvi, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 20th FEBRUARY, 2024.
P.C. :
application.
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHUBHADA SHANKAR SHANKAR KADAM KADAM Date: 2024.02.21 10:23:16 +0530
1/2
39-MCA-65-2023.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending domestic violence proceeding should affect or be considered alongside the custody proceeding before the Family Court at Bandra.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Varun Narendra Agarwal and ors.
Priyanka Varun Agarwal
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
