The applicant submitted that the matter had been settled between the parties out of court. The court disposed of the miscellaneous civil application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-MCA-321-2022.doc
Shantanu Dhudum
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 321 OF 2022
Vivekanand Rantidev Chudgar ….Applicant Versus Dimple Chudgar & Anr. ….Respondents
Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANTANU SHANKARSA SHANKARSA DHUDUM DHUDUM Date: 2024.02.06 13:32:06 +0530
Ms. Aishwarya Kantawala a/w Ms. Diya Jayan, Advocate for the Appellant. Ms. Tanaya Goswami, AGP, Advocate for the Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2024.
P.C. :
matter is settled between the parties, out of the Court. Hence, application has become infructuous and requested to pass appropriate order.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
1/1
Vivekanand Rantidev Chudgar
Dimple Chudgar
State
SHIVKUMAR DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
