Allowed

Gauri Milind Khadtale v. Milind Pundlik Khadtale

Bombay HC4 Mar 2024MCA/264/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An application was filed to transfer a pending marriage petition from the Civil Judge court at Niphad to the Family Court at Nashik. The court allowed the transfer considering the applicant's residence in Nashik and need to care for her ill father and minor daughter.

What did the court decide?

Marriage Petition No.A-78 of 2019 transferred to Family Court, Nashik; parties directed to appear on 1st April 2024.

Gauri Milind Khadtale Vs Milind Pundlik Khadtale — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

31-MCA-264-2023.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.264 OF 2023

¶4

Gauri Milind Khadtale …. Applicant

¶5

V/s. Milind Pundlik Khadtale …. Respondent

¶6

Digitally signed NILAM by NILAM SANTOSH SANTOSHKAMBLE KAMBLE Date: 2024.03.05 10:52:55 +0530

¶7

Mr.Pratik P. Pawar, for the Applicant. None present for the Respondent.

¶8

CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

¶9

DATE : 4^th MARCH 2024

¶10

P.C:-

¶11

. By this Application, the Applicant is seeking transfer of Marriage petition No.A-78/2019 pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Niphad to Family Court, Nashik.

¶12

It is contention of the learned counsel for the

¶13

Applicant that, the Applicant stays at Nashik Road with her parents and her minor daughter. The Applicant’s father is suffering from cancer. The Applicant’s to take care of her father and minor daughter. The Applicant is finding difficult to attend

¶14

the Court dates at Niphad. Hence, requested to allow the

¶15

N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2

¶16

31-MCA-264-2023.doc

¶17

Application.

¶18

Though Respondent is served and sufficient chances given to the Respondent to argue the matter, but Respondent is absent. Hence, I am deciding this application on merit.

¶19

The Applicant stays with her parents and minor daughter at Nashik Road. Her father is suffering from cancer. The Applicant’s to take care of father and minor daughter. It is finding difficult for her to attend the Court dates at Niphad. Considering the reasons mentioned in the Application as well as it is settled principle of law convenience of the wife has to be considered while transferring the Petition over the husband.

¶20

In view of above, I pass following order.

¶21

ORDER

¶22

(i) The Marriage Petition No.A-78 of 2019 pending before Civil Judge Senior Division, Niphad be transferred to Family Court, Nashik.

¶23

(ii) Both the parties to appear before the concerned Court on 1^st April 2024.

¶24

(iii) The Application is allowed and disposed of.

¶25

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

¶26

N.S. Kamble page 2 of 2

Gauri Milind Khadtale v. Milind Pundlik Khadtale

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gauri Milind Khadtale v. Milind Pundlik Khadtale

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Thane vs Gousai Bashir Shaikh and Ors.

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited Thr. Mr.Satpalsingh Rajput-Manager Legal vs Mr. Bablu Mushtaque Shaikh and Anr.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Thane vs Gousai Bashir Shaikh and Ors.

Smt. Priyanka Mithun Kambale and Anr. Vs Reliance General Insurance Company Limited

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation through Divisional Controller,Pune Vs Uttam Anna Bankar

Sou.Kamal Vishnu Shendge Vs Shri.Sayyad Dastagir Honmurgi and Ors.