Allowed

Sau. Shivani Jayram Tuwar v. Jayram Pundllik Tuwar

Bombay HC11 Nov 2024MCA/183/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a misc. civil application transferring a marriage petition from Newasa to Pune Family Court due to the applicant-wife's responsibility for minor children. The court directed the proceedings be heard cumulatively with a pending PWDVA in Pune.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; Marriage Petition No. 154/2023 transferred to Family Court, Pune, to be heard same day as PWDVA No. 99/2024.

Sau. Shivani Jayram Tuwar Vs Jayram Pundllik Tuwar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

mca183.24.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

68 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 183 OF 2024

¶5

Sau. Shivani Jayram Tuwar ….Applicant VERSUS Jayram Pundllik Tuwar …..Respondent

¶6

Mr. Mohammad Waseemullah, Advocate for Applicant.

¶7

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 11^th NOVEMBER, 2024.

¶8

PER COURT :

¶9

None for Respondent though served. This indicates that Respondent is not interested in opposing the application.

¶10

Applicant is wife seeking transfer of Marriage Petition No. 154/2023 pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Newasa to Family Court, Pune. It is the case of the Applicant that she has responsibility of a minor daughter and owing to the same, it is difficult for her to travel from Newasa to Pune. She further claims that PWDVA No. 99/2024 filed by her against Respondent is pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pune and, in any case, Respondent is required to attend the said proceeding at Pune.

¶11

¶12

mca183.24.odt

¶13

Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that no prejudice much less irreparable loss will cause to the Respondent if the proceeding is transferred from Newasa to Pune as in any event Respondent is required to attend the proceeding filed by the Applicant.

¶14

For the reasons mentioned in the application as well as in view of the conduct of Respondent of not opposing the application, this Court has no reason not to accept the contention of Applicant. Prejudice will cause to the Applicant if she is called upon to attend the proceeding at Newasa owing to the responsibility of a minor daughter. In view of the above, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’.

¶15

In order to ensure that Respondent/husband is not harassed, the proceeding of Marriage Petition No. 154/2023 shall be heard on the same day on which hearing of PWDVA No. 99/2024 is fixed. It shall be the responsibility of Applicant/wife to ensure the same.

¶16

dyb

Sau. Shivani Jayram Tuwar v. Jayram Pundllik Tuwar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sau. Shivani Jayram Tuwar v. Jayram Pundllik Tuwar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gajanan Baliram Wallad vs the State of Maharashtra

Sadhau Alias Sadeo S/O Dhondiba @ Dhondiram Mane and Others vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Swati Piyush Paltiwale and Ors. vs Fareed Abdul Ghani Waghu and Anr.

Avesh Abdul Kalam Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra

Rashid @ Imran Chand Qureshi vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sanjay Madhukar Tambadi vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.