The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the miscellaneous civil application for transferring a peti
Misc. Civil Application allowed; transfer directive issued; FC to permit respondent via video conferencing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
133.24MCA
2024:BHC-AUG:22811
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2024
PRACHI RAHUL KANKAL VERSUS RAHUL S/O. ABHIMANYU KANKAL
Advocate for the applicant : Mr.R.R.Karpe a/w. Adv.Sagalgile P.J. Advocate for the respondent : Adv.G.K.Naik Thigale
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 23.09.2024
P.C. :
1] The learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record affidavit of respondent – sole wherein he has consented to transfer the Petition No.A-617 of 2014 from the Family Court at Pune to the Family Court at Ahmednagar.
2] In view of the affidavit filed by the respondent – sole, the Misc. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-B.
3] However, the Family Court at Ahmednagar is directed to permit the respondent – husband to appear
2
133.24MCA
through Video Conferencing wherever it is possible so as to avoid inconvenience to the respondent-husband, so also, the Family Court at Ahmednagar to decide the proceedings expeditiously.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE
DDC
PRACHI RAHUL KANKAL
RAHUL S/O. ABHIMANYU KANKAL
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
