Anil Dashrath Patil v. Mukond Subhashrao Beshkrao
Case brief
What is this about?
The Bombay High Court dismissed a second appeal and an interim application. The court held that the appellant failed to prove the existence of a cart-way and that the lower courts correctly appreciated the evidence. It ruled that re-evaluating facts is not allowed under Section 100 CPC, and additional documents lacked merit under Order XLI Rule 27.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal and the Interim Application for production of documents were dismissed.