Interim application seeking condonation of a 14-day delay in filing an appeal. Court heard both sides, found sufficient explanation, and condoned the delay, requiring removal of remaining office objections within four weeks.
Delay of 14 days in filing the appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.ia-9349-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9349 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 34520 OF 2023
LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE
Digitally signed by LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2024.12.21 16:14:26 +0530
Narayan Poojari & Anr. .. Applicant
Versus
Vijay Vitthal Jadhav & Ors. .. Respondents
Adv. Prathamesh Bhargude a/w Sumit Sonare for the Applicant/Appellant .
Adv. Vilas Tapkire for the Respondents.
CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE: DECEMBER 18, 2024
P. C.
delay of approximately 14 days in filing the above Appeal.
Applicant/Appellant and the learned Advocate appearing for the Respondents, we are satisfied that sufficient explanation is given for
Page 1 of 2 DECEMBER 18, 2024
Laxmi
15.ia-9349-24.doc
condoning the delay of 14 days. In these circumstances, the delay is hereby condoned.
[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
Page 2 of 2 DECEMBER 18, 2024
Laxmi
1 issue framed by the court
Should the 14-day delay in filing the appeal be condoned?
Narayan Poojari & Anr.
Vijay Vitthal Jadhav & Ors.
B. P. Colabawalla
Somasekhar Sundaresan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
