The Bombay High Court accepted the applicant's explanation for a three-day delay in filing a second appeal. The court held that the delay was not inordinate and was caused by an inadvertent delay in obtaining a certified copy of the judgment.
Condonation of three days delay in filing the present Second Appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
60-IA-841-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.841 OF 2024 IN
REJECTED CASE NO.1190 OF 2019
(E-filing)
Shri Laxmikant Vyas
...Applicant
Versus
Shri Puranchand Ramswaroop Bansal & Ors.
...Respondents.
None for the Applicant.
Mr. Heenal Wadhwa a/w. Mr. Kaustubh Joshi for Respondent Nos.1 to 9 (Thr. VC).
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.
Date : 27th March , 2024.
P. C. :
1. Interim Application has been preferred by the
applicant seeking condonation of delay of 3 days caused in
preferring the present appeal.
1 of 2
rsk
60-IA-841-2024.doc
inadvertently the application for certified copy was made after three days of passing of the impugned judgment and as such there has been delay in filing the present Second Appeal.
6. Interim Application stands allowed.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
2 of 2
rsk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of three days in filing the second appeal due to inadvertence should be condoned.
Whether the explanation for the delay offered by the applicant is acceptable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Laxmikant Vyas
Shri Puranchand Ramswaroop Bansal
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
