The High Court of Bombay allowed Interim Application No. 8090 of 2024 filed by the applicant, granting the prayers and restoring the appeal to file, with directions to take necessary steps within four weeks.
Prayers in clauses (a) and (b) allowed; appeal restored to file; no interest awarded for 7 years and 298 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
50-IA-8090-24.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8090 OF 2024
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2012
Arjun Shrirang Nawadkar … Applicant
IN THE MATTER OF :
Arjun Shrirang Nawadkar … Appellant
Versus
Satish Tukaram Pisal and Anr. ...Respondent
Mr. Sangramsinh S. Yadav, Advocate for the Applicant.
Smt. Urmila K. Sanil, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 29th APRIL, 2024.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Considering the submissions of learned counsel applicant and
reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) and disposed of.3. The applicant to take necessary steps within four weeks.
4. The Applicant is not entitled for interest for the delayed period of 7
years 298 days if applicant succeeds in appeal.
5. The appeal is restored to file.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Digitally signed SONALI by SONALISATISH KILAJE SATISH Date:2024.04.30 KILAJE 14:21:54+0530
1/1
Arjun Shrirang Nawadkar
Satish Tukaram Pisal
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court