Late Shri. Jeevan Ambo Patil, Deceased Thr.Lrs.Shri.Gopal Jeevan Patil and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra (Thr.the Special Land Acqisition Officer

Late Shri. Jeevan Ambo Patil, Deceased Thr. Lrs. …Applicants/ - Shri.Gopal Jeevan Patil And Anr. Org. Respondent IN THE MATTER BETWEEN The State of Maharashtra ...Appellant (Orig Opponent)

¶10

Versus

¶11

Late Shri. Jeevan Ambo Patil, Deceased Thr. Lrs. …Respondents - Shri.Gopal Jeevan Patil And Anr.

¶12

¶13

Mr. Hemant P Ghadigaonkar, a/w Ms. Pallabi Chatterjee Advocate for Applicant.

¶14

Ms. Tanaya Goswami, AGP for Respondent/state.

¶15

¶16

CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.

¶17

DATE : 12^th JANUARY, 2024

¶18

P.C. :

¶19

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶20

This is an Application by Original Claimants (Respondents in First Appeal) for condonation of delay of about 1 year and 6 months caused in filing their Cross Objections. The matter is arising out of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984.

¶21

The Appeal by the State is already admitted. The

Page 1 of 2

Shubham Talle

32-IA-7950-2023.doc

Application is filed sometime in February-2021, however, till today no reply is filed by the State, opposing delay condonation.

¶26

In that view of the matter, considering the averments in the application, the extent of delay and the fact that the dispute is arising out of compensation payable for compulsory acquisition, sufficient cause is made out.

¶27

Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Delay is condoned. Cross Objections be numbered. The Interim Application is disposed of.

¶28

All concerned to act on authenticated or digitally signed copy of this order.

¶29

Page 2 of 2

¶30

Shubham Talle

Late Shri. Jeevan Ambo Patil, Deceased Thr.Lrs.Shri.Gopal Jeevan Patil and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra (Thr.the Special Land Acqisition Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Late Shri. Jeevan Ambo Patil, Deceased Thr.Lrs.Shri.Gopal Jeevan Patil and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra (Thr.the Special Land Acqisition Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tata Aig General Insurance Company Limited, Pune vs Smt. Shridevi Vijay Tankale and Ors.

Hafsa Nooruddin Shaikh vs 1. Mrs. Sarifabi Abubaker Lambey and Another

Smt. Ester Kantraj Naidu vs Rostin Kantraj Naidu and Ors.

Shri.Atmaram @Hausha Mahadeo Thakur Deceased Thr. Lrs. Smt. Mathurabai Atmaram @ Hausha Thakur and Vs the State of Maharashtra (through the Special Land Acquisition Officer)

Employees State Insurance Corporation and Anr. Vs M/S. Truegraph Charts Pvt. Ltd.

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.,Thane vs Dhondji Biraji Gurkhe and Ors.