Allowed

Goldie Joginder Singh Anand v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC22 Feb 2024IA/686/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an interim application seeking restoration of Criminal Appeal No. 997 of 2010 dismissed for non-prosecution, the High Court of Bombay condoned a delay of 135 days subject to the payment of Rs. 5,000 to a Bar Association Fund.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 135 days is condoned and the application for restoration is allowed subject to payment of a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to the Advocates' Association of Western India Generation Next Fund within two

Goldie Joginder Singh Anand Vs State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

P.H. Jayani 09 IA686.2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 686 OF 2024
IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 997 OF 2010

¶6

Goldie Joginder Singh Anand
v/s.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

¶8

…. Applicant

¶9

…. Respondents

¶10

Mr. Nihar Ghag for the Applicant.
Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for the State.

¶11

CORAM: A.S. GADKARI AND

¶12

 SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

¶13

DATED : 22nd FEBRUARY, 2024.

¶14

P. C. :-

¶15

1) This is an Application for restoration of Criminal Application

¶16

No.997 of 2010, which was dismissed for non-prosecution by Order dated
31st August, 2023.

¶17

2) There is delay of 135 days in preferring the present Application.

¶18

3)Reasons for dismissal of the Criminal Application are stated in
para No.1 of the said Order dated 31st August, 2023.

¶19

4)However, at the profused pleadings of learned Advocate for the

¶20

Applicant and subject to the condition that, the Applicant shall pay a cost of
Rs.5,000/-, to the Advocates’ Association of Western India Generation Next

¶21

Fund, Mumbai, within a period of two weeks from the date of uploading of

¶22

HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV

¶23

Order, delay is condoned and Application is allowed in terms of prayer

¶24

Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2024.03.05 16:44:30 +0530

¶25

1/2

¶26

09 IA686.2024.doc

¶27

P.H. Jayani

¶28

clauses (a) and (b).

¶29

4.1) Details of the bank account for payment of cost are as under :-

¶30

`Account Name`	`:-`	`Advocates Association of Western` `India Generation Next.`
`Account Number`	`:-`	`000110110007807.`
`Bank Name`	`:-`	`Bank of India.`
`Branch Name`	`:-`	`Mumbai Main.`
`IFSC Code`	`:-`	`BKID0000001.`

¶31

5) Application is allowed in aforesaid terms.

¶32

6) It is made clear that, if cost is not paid within the stipulated

¶33

period, the present Application shall stand dismissed without further
reference to this Court.

¶34

(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

¶35

2/2

Goldie Joginder Singh Anand v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Goldie Joginder Singh Anand v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Amitabha De Vs the Senior Inspector of Police.

Hasan @ Hasan Shaikh Gurudeepsingh Kotra Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Zulfikar Ali Barodawala @ Lala Bhai Vs National Investigation Agency and Anr.

Wasim @ Wasimvatta Hafiz Sayyed Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rahim Munawar Pathan Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Qamruddin Faridduddin Salmani Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.