Writ petition challenging a Commissioner's order passed under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code was disposed of in view of the alternative statutory remedy of second revision before the State Government, with all questions left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-wp-13218-2018 with connected.doc
Shabnoor
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.13218 OF 2018
SHABNOORAYUBPATHAN Digitallysigned bySHABNOORAYUBPATHANDate:2024.03.1817:15:56+0530
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6677 OF 2024
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2261 OF 2019
Yashwant Govind Shinde (Since Deceased) Through Legal Heirs … Petitioners V/s. Jaysing Lingappa Shelar & Ors … Respondents
Mr. Sandeep S. Koregave, for Petitioner-Applicant. Mr. Parmeshwar A. Bhise, for Respondent No.1(a) to 1(c).
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : MARCH 18, 2024
P.C.:
1
2-wp-13218-2018 with connected.doc
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should proceed despite the availability of a second revision remedy under Section 257 MLRC before the State Government.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yashwant Govind Shinde (Since Deceased) Through Legal Heirs
Jaysing Lingappa Shelar & Ors
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
