Interim application in a first appeal from 2000 seeking amendment; court allowed the application in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) and directed the applicants to carry out the amendment within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
59-ia-661-2024-fa-237-2000.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 661 OF 2024
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.237 OF 2000
Suresh Raghunath Patil (Deceased) through Legal Heirs
Versus Jaysingh Maruti More and ors. ….Respondents
Mr. Rahul P. Kasbekar i/b. Mr. P. D. Dalvi, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. J. J. Bardeskar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms. Poonam Mital, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 22nd JANUARY, 2024.
P.C. :
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHUBHADA SHANKAR SHANKAR KADAM KADAM Date: 2024.01.23 11:38:40 +0530
1/1
Usha Suresh Patil and ors.
Jaysingh Maruti More and ors.
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
