Disposed

Francis Simav Dmello (Decd.Thr.Lrs) Anubai F. Demello (Decd.Thr.Lrs) Teresa F. Demmlo v. Robert Francis Dmello and Ors.

Bombay HC21 Nov 2024IA/6545/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting requests to delete deceased parties from a second appeal and allowing interim applications to bring heirs on record, while disposing other applications as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to delete respondents; applications allowed to bring heirs on record; other applications disposed of as infructuous; matter added to final hearing board.

Francis Simav Dmello (Decd.Thr.Lrs) Anubai F… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

4.352.88 sa.docx

¶2

Iresh

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

SECOND APPEAL NO. 352 OF 1988

¶6

WITH

¶7

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6544 OF 2024 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6547 OF 2024 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6545 OF 2024 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6548 OF 2024 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6542 OF 2024 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6549 OF 2024

¶8

¶9

SECOND APPEAL NO. 352 OF 1988

¶10

Francis Simav Dmello (Deceased .....Appellants thr LRs) and ors

¶11

Vs.

¶12

Robert Francis Dmello (Deceased Thr. LRs) and ors

¶13

.....Respondents

¶14

Mr. Akshay S. Karlekar i/b Ms. Rani Girish Shinde for the appellants/applicants

¶15

Ms. Sayali Gangal h/f Mr. Dhanesh Patekar for respondent nos. 1, 2, 3/1, 3/3, 1(a) to 1(c)

¶16

IRESH MASHAL

¶17

Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2024.11.26 13:15:37 +0530

¶18

ORDER:

¶19

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 21^st NOVEMBER 2024

¶20

SECOND APPEAL NO. 352 OF 1988:

¶21

1. Learned advocate for the appellants on instructions seeks leave

¶22

to delete respondent nos. 4 to 9.

¶23

1/4

¶24

4.352.88 sa.docx

¶25

Leave granted. Appellants are permitted to delete the said

¶26

respondents at the risk of the appellants. Amendment to be carried out forthwith, in the Court.

¶27

Learned advocate for the appellants shall supply copy of the amended memo upon learned advocate appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Amended memo also to be filed in the Registry.

¶28

Learned advocate appearing for respondent nos. 1, 2, 1(a) to 1(c), 3/1 and 3/2 waives notice of the second appeal.

¶29

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6547 OF 2024:

¶30

Office has not placed the copy of the application before me.

¶31

Learned advocate for the applicants tendered the copy of the application which is taken on record. This application is for permission to delete deceased appellant nos. 1-1-1 and 1-2.

¶32

Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out forthwith, in the Court.

¶33

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6548 OF 2024:

¶34

This application is for deleting the name of deceased respondent

¶35

no. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that heirs of

¶36

2/4

¶37

4.352.88 sa.docx

¶38

deceased respondent no. 2 are already on record in different capacity.

¶39

He submits that the particulars are stated in paragraph 2 of the application.

¶40

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out forthwith, in the Court.

¶41

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6542 OF 2024:

¶42

This application is for bringing on record names of deceased respondent no. 7-7-1(B) and 7-7-3.

¶43

By a separate order, the appellant is already permitted to delete

¶44

the said respondent. Hence, this application has become infructuous.

¶45

Application is disposed of as infructuous.

¶46

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6549 OF 2024:

¶47

This application is for bringing on record names of heirs and

¶48

legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 1.

¶49

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the application is

¶50

within time.

¶51

3/4

¶52

4.352.88 sa.docx

¶53

Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment

¶54

to be carried out forthwith, in the Court.

¶55

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6544 OF 2024 AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6545 OF 2024:

¶56

Office has not placed copies of these applications. Learned counsel for the applicants tendered the copies of the applications which are taken on record.

¶57

These applications are for bringing on record names of heirs and

¶58

legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 9 and respondent no. 7-4 respectively.

¶59

By a separate order, appellants are permitted to delete the said respondents, hence, these applications have become infructuous.

¶60

Hence, applications are disposed of as infructuous.

¶61

Add the second appeal to the weekly final hearing board commencing from 2^nd December 2024.

¶62

[GAURI GODSE, J.]

¶63

4/4

Francis Simav Dmello (Decd.Thr.Lrs) Anubai F. Demello (Decd.Thr.Lrs) Teresa F. Demmlo v. Robert Francis Dmello and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Francis Simav Dmello (Decd.Thr.Lrs) Anubai F. Demello (Decd.Thr.Lrs) Teresa F. Demmlo v. Robert Francis Dmello and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

M/S. Aarti Company Partnership Firm Thou Part Vallabh Radhakisan Karwa vs Shri. Anil Malleshpa Gore and Anr.

Yadav Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. Thou MD vs the Managing Director, Bank of India

1 Bhamabai Tukaram Thorat and Anr. vs 1 Yashwant Bapu Shendge Since Deceased Legal Heirs and Ors.

1.SMT. Maryambi Zikriya Mujawar and Ors. vs 1.SMT. Fatimabee Dilawar Jamadar and Ors.

Pravin Shrirang Khandare vs Nandini Urf Nanda Pravin Khandare

Chandu Kanji Gada vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai H/E Ward Office