Interim application seeking unspecified modification of an order was dismissed. The Court held that without specifying the nature of the modification or possessing power to alter the earlier order, the application could not be entertained.
Interim application dismissed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
42-ia6537-2024.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6537 OF 2024
VAIBHAV RAMESH
JADHAV
Digitally signed byVAIBHAVRAMESH JADHAVDate: 2024.03.1118:26:46 +0530
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10927 of 2022
Vilas Narayan Jaid & Ors. … Applicants V/s. Shankar Maruti Jaid (Deceased) & Ors. … Respondents
Ms. Priyanka A. Nawale i/by Shinde & Co. for the applicants.
Mr. Yogesh Thorat i/by Mr. Ashok B. Thorat for the respondents.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 11, 2024
P.C.:
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court can entertain and modify an interim application when the specific nature of the modification sought is not stated and the power to modify is missing.
Vilas Narayan Jaid & Ors.
Shankar Maruti Jaid (Deceased) & Ors.
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
