Application for condonation of 24 days' delay in filing a criminal appeal. Despite opposition from the State and respondent No.2, the court allowed the application in terms of prayer clause (a) and listed the appeal for admission on a subsequent date.
Delay of 24 days in filing the criminal appeal was condoned in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:17976
Darshan Patil 22-apealst-2663-24.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO. 2663 OF 2024 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 638 OF 2024
SANIO PASKU KINI .. APPELLANT
VS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS
Adv. Vishal Ghogale for the Appellant. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for the State.
Ms. Yugandhara Khanwilkar for Respondent No.2.
-----------CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : APRIL 18, 2024
P.C. :
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 638 OF 2024
days in filing the Criminal Appeal.
1/2
22-apealst-2663-24.docx
Darshan Patil
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
2/2
Signed by: Darshan Patil Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 18/04/2024 19:57:59
Sanio Pasku Kini
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
