The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The court granted leave and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, consequently disposing of the pending interim application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITAJOHNSON Digitally signed bySMITA JOHNSONGONSALVESDate: 2024.03.07 GONSALVES 09:50:18 +0530
501.ao65-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.65 OF 2024
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.618 OF 2024 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.65 OF 2024
Greenpeace India Society ...Appellant/Applicant
vs.
Centre for Environment and Agrochemicals ...Respondent
Mr. Chetan Mali, for the Appellant.
Mr. Kshitish Shukla, for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 6 MARCH 2024
P.C. :
this appeal with liberty to pursue the remedy available in the law.
1 / 2
501.ao65-24.doc
sg
disposed of.
(R.N. LADDHA, J.)
2 / 2
Greenpeace India Society
Centre for Environment and Agrochemicals
R.N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court