1. Mr. Kiran Purushottam Bhoir v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:6713
Diksha Rane 14.ia.577-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.577/2024 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO.2240/2024
MR. KIRAN PURUSHOTTAM BHOIR
..APPLICANT/APPELLANT
VS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT
Adv. Vinod Sangvikar a/w. Adv. Yogesh Morbale for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 12, 2024.
P.C. :
1. Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant seeks leave to amend the applications as he wants to implead the complainant as party respondent no.2.
2. Leave is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
3. Issue notice to the newly added respondent no.2, returnable on 6/3/2024. Learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of the State. The Investigating OfÏcer to inform the respondent no. 2 the next date of hearing and
1/2
Diksha Rane 14.ia.577-24.doc
that she has a right to be represented by an advocate or through legal aid.
4. List the criminal revision application on 6/3/2024 .
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.577/2024 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO.2240/2024
5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
6. Learned APP opposed the application for condonation of delay.
7. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).
8. The interim application is disposed of.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
2/2
Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 12/02/2024 14:27:04
MR KIRAN PURUSHOTTAM BHOIR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MS KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court